Was Qumran Abandoned at the End of the First Century BCE?
The chronology and development of Qumran in Period I have been the subject of much debate. One of the most influential hypotheses to emerge is Jodi Magness's revision of Roland de Vaux's chronology. In this paper, we revisit a key point of Magness's chronology, namely, her suggestion...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Scholar's Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Journal of Biblical literature
Year: 2016, 卷: 135, 發布: 2, Pages: 301-320 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Qumran
/ 破壞
/ 測年
/ 地層學
/ Silberfund
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HH Archaeology KBJ Italy |
| Further subjects: | B
DEBATES & debating
B Qumran Site (West Bank) B Occupations B DE Vaux, Roland B Chronology B MAGNESS, Jodi |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | The chronology and development of Qumran in Period I have been the subject of much debate. One of the most influential hypotheses to emerge is Jodi Magness's revision of Roland de Vaux's chronology. In this paper, we revisit a key point of Magness's chronology, namely, her suggestion that Qumran was destroyed and abandoned around 9/8 BCE and reinhabited ca. 4/1 BCE. Our analysis of the published evidence indicates that this conclusion can no longer be supported. Instead, we propose collapsing Periods I and II into one long phase of occupation with various architectural subphases. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1934-3876 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of Biblical literature
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15699/jbl.1352.2016.3085 |