Streeter's 'Other' Synoptic Solution: The Matthew Conflator Hypothesis
B. H. Streeter's Four Gospels has had a critical influence on the study of the Synoptic Problem. Unfortunately, this seminal work rests on two fundamental errors. When these are corrected, however, Streeter points to a fully satisfying solution to the Synoptic Problem: Mark wrote first, Luke us...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
Dans: |
New Testament studies
Année: 2016, Volume: 62, Numéro: 2, Pages: 207-226 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Streeter, Burnett Hillman 1874-1937, The four gospels
/ Problème synoptique
/ Bibel. Matthäusevangelium
|
Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Matthean Posteriority |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | B. H. Streeter's Four Gospels has had a critical influence on the study of the Synoptic Problem. Unfortunately, this seminal work rests on two fundamental errors. When these are corrected, however, Streeter points to a fully satisfying solution to the Synoptic Problem: Mark wrote first, Luke used Mark and other sources and, at a later date, Matthew conflated Mark, Luke and other sources - including some also used by Luke. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688515000454 |