Luthers Lehre vom "servum arbitrium" aus dogmatischer Perspektive
Luther's doctrine of the unfree will and its interpretations, as found in the context of current philosophical debate on free will, are presented and compared. Even if Luther could be called a theological compatibilist, serious problems remain. These can be described as a trilemma. Either free...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Allemand |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Année: 2018, Volume: 64, Numéro: 3, Pages: 203-224 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Luther, Martin 1483-1546, De servo arbitrio
/ Libre arbitre
/ Réception <scientifique>
/ Klein, Andreas 1967-
/ Bruder, Benedikt
/ Althaus, Paul 1888-1966
/ Ebeling, Gerhard 1912-2001
/ Härle, Wilfried 1941-
|
Classifications IxTheo: | KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance KAJ Époque contemporaine KDD Église protestante NBE Anthropologie |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Luther's doctrine of the unfree will and its interpretations, as found in the context of current philosophical debate on free will, are presented and compared. Even if Luther could be called a theological compatibilist, serious problems remain. These can be described as a trilemma. Either free will must be postulated (in contradiction with the Reformation); or the mercy of God must be restricted; or a dualistic eschatology must be abandoned in favor of the apocatastasis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2018.64.3.203 |