Formal and Material Consequences in Ockham and Buridan
William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Vivarium
Jahr: 2018, Band: 56, Heft: 3/4, Seiten: 241-271 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | KAE Kirchengeschichte 900-1300; Hochmittelalter KAF Kirchengeschichte 1300-1500; Spätmittelalter VB Logik; philosophische Hermeneutik; philosophische Erkenntnislehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
William of Ockham
John Buridan
consequences
hylomorphism
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy. It identifies the root of the discrepancy not in a difference between Ockham’s and Buridan’s notions of propositional hylomorphism but rather in Ockham’s endorsement of relational characterizations of consequences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Enthält: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341360 |