Formal and Material Consequences in Ockham and Buridan
William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Brill
2018
|
En: |
Vivarium
Año: 2018, Volumen: 56, Número: 3/4, Páginas: 241-271 |
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | KAE Edad Media Central KAF Baja Edad Media VB Hermenéutica ; Filosofía |
Otras palabras clave: | B
William of Ockham
John Buridan
consequences
hylomorphism
|
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Sumario: | William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy. It identifies the root of the discrepancy not in a difference between Ockham’s and Buridan’s notions of propositional hylomorphism but rather in Ockham’s endorsement of relational characterizations of consequences. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
Obras secundarias: | In: Vivarium
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341360 |