Formal and Material Consequences in Ockham and Buridan
William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Brill
2018
|
| Em: |
Vivarium
Ano: 2018, Volume: 56, Número: 3/4, Páginas: 241-271 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | KAE Idade Média Central KAF Baixa Idade Média VB Hermenêutica ; Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
William of Ockham
John Buridan
consequences
hylomorphism
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Resumo: | William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy. It identifies the root of the discrepancy not in a difference between Ockham’s and Buridan’s notions of propositional hylomorphism but rather in Ockham’s endorsement of relational characterizations of consequences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Obras secundárias: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341360 |