Formal and Material Consequences in Ockham and Buridan
William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Vivarium
Year: 2018, 卷: 56, 發布: 3/4, Pages: 241-271 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAF Church history 1300-1500; late Middle Ages VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
William of Ockham
John Buridan
consequences
hylomorphism
|
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| 總結: | William of Ockham and John Buridan provide different accounts of the distinction between formal and material consequences. Some consequences – in particular, enthymemes – that Ockham would classify as formal would be classified as material by Buridan. This paper explains this taxonomical discrepancy. It identifies the root of the discrepancy not in a difference between Ockham’s and Buridan’s notions of propositional hylomorphism but rather in Ockham’s endorsement of relational characterizations of consequences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Contains: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341360 |