Marsilius of Inghen on the Definition of consequentia
This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsili...
Τόπος έκδοσης: | Vivarium |
---|---|
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Brill
2018
|
Στο/Στη: |
Vivarium
Έτος: 2018, Τόμος: 56, Τεύχος: 3/4, Σελίδες: 272-291 |
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | KAF Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1300-1500, Ύστερος Μεσαίωνας VA Φιλοσοφία VB Λογική, Φιλοσοφική Ερμηνευτική, Φιλοσοφικό δόγμα της γνώσης |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Marsilius of Inghen
John Buridan
Albert of Saxony
consequentiae
validity
|
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Σύνοψη: | This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsilius’ account is based on a conception of consequence as a relation of entailment among propositions rather than as a type of conditional sentence and, thus, moves the discussion away from the sentential level. Therefore, Marsilius’ theory represents an original and important contribution to fourteenth-century discussions on consequences. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Vivarium
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341359 |