Marsilius of Inghen on the Definition of consequentia
This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsili...
| Pubblicato in: | Vivarium |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Vivarium
Anno: 2018, Volume: 56, Fascicolo: 3/4, Pagine: 272-291 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | KAF Tardo Medioevo VA Filosofia VB Ermeneutica; Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Marsilius of Inghen
John Buridan
Albert of Saxony
consequentiae
validity
|
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Riepilogo: | This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsilius’ account is based on a conception of consequence as a relation of entailment among propositions rather than as a type of conditional sentence and, thus, moves the discussion away from the sentential level. Therefore, Marsilius’ theory represents an original and important contribution to fourteenth-century discussions on consequences. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Comprende: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341359 |