Marsilius of Inghen on the Definition of consequentia
This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsili...
Опубликовано в: : | Vivarium |
---|---|
Главный автор: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Brill
2018
|
В: |
Vivarium
Год: 2018, Том: 56, Выпуск: 3/4, Страницы: 272-291 |
Индексация IxTheo: | KAF Позднее средневековье VA Философия VB Герменевтика ; Философия |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Marsilius of Inghen
John Buridan
Albert of Saxony
consequentiae
validity
|
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Итог: | This paper offers an analysis of Marsilius of Inghen’s definition of consequentia and of his treatment of logical validity as presented in the first book of his treatise on Consequentiae. Comparing Marsilius of Inghen’s, John Buridan’s, and Albert of Saxony’s theories, the author argues that Marsilius’ account is based on a conception of consequence as a relation of entailment among propositions rather than as a type of conditional sentence and, thus, moves the discussion away from the sentential level. Therefore, Marsilius’ theory represents an original and important contribution to fourteenth-century discussions on consequences. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
Второстепенные работы: | In: Vivarium
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341359 |