Infused virtue as virtue simply: the centrality of the Augustinian definition in Summa theologiae I/2.55-67

‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miner, Robert C. 1970- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Cambridge Univ. Press [2018]
En: Scottish journal of theology
Año: 2018, Volumen: 71, Número: 4, Páginas: 411-424
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Aristoteles 384 a. C.-322 a. C. / Augustinus, Aurelius, Santo 354-430 / Recepción / Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274, Summa theologiae 1 / Virtud / Hábito
Clasificaciones IxTheo:KAE Edad Media Central
KDB Iglesia católica
NCA Ética
VA Filosofía
Otras palabras clave:B Augustine
B Ethics
B infused virtue
B Peter Lombard
B Virtue
B Thomas Aquinas
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some conclude that Aquinas presents this definition only to set it aside. Against such interpretations, I demonstrate that Thomas' use of the definition is the key to understanding the treatment of virtue at Summa I/2.55-63. First, I show why Thomas places the definition where he does, at the end of question 55. Second, I show that the definition is not peripheral but rather discloses the inner logic of his treatment of virtue. Finally, I show that for the reader who grasps this inner logic, the conclusion drawn explicitly at Question 65 - that only infused virtue is virtue simply - is revealing but not surprising.
ISSN:1475-3065
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000601