Infused virtue as virtue simply: the centrality of the Augustinian definition in Summa theologiae I/2.55-67

‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some c...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Miner, Robert C. 1970- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Cambridge Univ. Press [2018]
In: Scottish journal of theology
Anno: 2018, Volume: 71, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 411-424
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Aristoteles 384 a.C.-322 a.C. / Augustinus, Aurelius, Santo 354-430 / Ricezione / Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274, Summa theologiae 1 / Virtù / Habitus
Notazioni IxTheo:KAE Pieno Medioevo
KDB Chiesa cattolica
NCA Etica
VA Filosofia
Altre parole chiave:B Augustine
B Ethics
B infused virtue
B Peter Lombard
B Virtue
B Thomas Aquinas
Accesso online: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some conclude that Aquinas presents this definition only to set it aside. Against such interpretations, I demonstrate that Thomas' use of the definition is the key to understanding the treatment of virtue at Summa I/2.55-63. First, I show why Thomas places the definition where he does, at the end of question 55. Second, I show that the definition is not peripheral but rather discloses the inner logic of his treatment of virtue. Finally, I show that for the reader who grasps this inner logic, the conclusion drawn explicitly at Question 65 - that only infused virtue is virtue simply - is revealing but not surprising.
ISSN:1475-3065
Comprende:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000601