Infused virtue as virtue simply: the centrality of the Augustinian definition in Summa theologiae I/2.55-67

‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some c...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miner, Robert C. 1970- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Cambridge Univ. Press [2018]
Em: Scottish journal of theology
Ano: 2018, Volume: 71, Número: 4, Páginas: 411-424
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Aristoteles 384 a.C.-322 a.C. / Augustinus, Aurelius, Santo 354-430 / Recepção / Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274, Summa theologiae 1 / Virtude / Hábito
Classificações IxTheo:KAE Idade Média Central
KDB Igreja católica
NCA Ética
VA Filosofia
Outras palavras-chave:B Augustine
B Ethics
B infused virtue
B Peter Lombard
B Virtue
B Thomas Aquinas
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descrição
Resumo:‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some conclude that Aquinas presents this definition only to set it aside. Against such interpretations, I demonstrate that Thomas' use of the definition is the key to understanding the treatment of virtue at Summa I/2.55-63. First, I show why Thomas places the definition where he does, at the end of question 55. Second, I show that the definition is not peripheral but rather discloses the inner logic of his treatment of virtue. Finally, I show that for the reader who grasps this inner logic, the conclusion drawn explicitly at Question 65 - that only infused virtue is virtue simply - is revealing but not surprising.
ISSN:1475-3065
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000601