Taxonomy Construction and the Normative Turn in Religious Studies
Jonathan Z. Smith contends that a taxonomic agenda underlies the study of religion. Before Smith, structuralist scholars saw it as their task to uncover the roots of human taxonomic arrangements that present themselves as natural. Drawing somewhat anachronistically on Smith's taxonomic model, I...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
En: |
Religions
Año: 2017, Volumen: 8, Número: 12, Páginas: 1-15 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Social Anthropology
B the study of religion B Categories B Taxonomy B normativity and values B Structuralism B Jonathan Z. Smith |
Acceso en línea: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Sumario: | Jonathan Z. Smith contends that a taxonomic agenda underlies the study of religion. Before Smith, structuralist scholars saw it as their task to uncover the roots of human taxonomic arrangements that present themselves as natural. Drawing somewhat anachronistically on Smith's taxonomic model, I argue that underlying investigative categories posed by structural anthropologists are operative strategies of subjective value and valuation. I employ Smith to amend structuralist classificatory paradigms and to speak to questions of normativity, values, and concealed agendas in the contemporary study of religion. Smith's comparative program serves as a fertile territory of encounter between divergent religious studies subfields. In short, I argue that although the normative turn in religious studies has generally succeeded in deconstructing appeals to scholarly objectivity, it faces challenges along other parameters. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel8120270 |