Everything in Motion is Put in Motion by Another: A Principle in Aquinas's First Way

I argue for a novel reading of the mover principle used in Aquinas's motion proofs for God's existence. Many interpret Aquinas's principle as holding that everything in motion is moved by something else currently in contact with it. Others, following James Weisheipl, understand the pr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shields, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center [2018]
In: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2018, Volume: 92, Issue: 4, Pages: 535-561
Further subjects:B FREE will & determinism
B GOD in Christianity
B DOCTRINAL theology
B Christianity
B THOMAS, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1588253171
003 DE-627
005 20190301123631.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190301s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/acpq2018829163  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1588253171 
035 |a (DE-576)518253171 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ518253171 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1072435012  |0 (DE-627)827493541  |0 (DE-576)433510595  |4 aut  |a Shields, Daniel 
109 |a Shields, Daniel 
245 1 0 |a Everything in Motion is Put in Motion by Another  |b A Principle in Aquinas's First Way  |c Daniel Shields 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I argue for a novel reading of the mover principle used in Aquinas's motion proofs for God's existence. Many interpret Aquinas's principle as holding that everything in motion is moved by something else currently in contact with it. Others, following James Weisheipl, understand the principle as claiming only that everything being moved is being moved by something else. I argue against both readings and hold that the principle means that everything in motion is moved by something else-whether that something else simply set it in motion or is currently moving it by contact. By looking closely at Aquinas's inductive argument for the mover principle, I show that simultaneity between mover and moved is not necessary on Aquinas's view. My interpretation allows me to respond to objections to Aquinas's act-potency argument for the mover principle more convincingly than others, and sets the groundwork for robust engagement between Thomism and modern science. 
650 4 |a Christianity 
650 4 |a DOCTRINAL theology 
650 4 |a FREE will & determinism 
650 4 |a GOD in Christianity 
650 4 |a THOMAS, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American catholic philosophical quarterly  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990  |g 92(2018), 4, Seite 535-561  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372353592  |w (DE-600)2122401-8  |w (DE-576)47637314X  |x 2153-8441  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:92  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:535-561 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2018829163  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 92  |j 2018  |e 4  |h 535-561 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3057078710 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1588253171 
LOK |0 005 20190301111059 
LOK |0 008 190301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw