Framing archaeology in the Near East: the application of social theory to fieldwork

"This volume presents a series of studies by scholars working in Middle Eastern archaeology who actively apply social theory to interpret their fieldwork. It aims to highlight the value of using social theory in the interpretation of field work in a region where, traditionally, such approaches...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Milevski, Ianir 1955- (Editor ) ; Levy, Thomas Evan 1953- (Editor )
Tipo de documento: Print Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Servicio de pedido Subito: Pedir ahora.
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Sheffield, UK Bristol, CT equinox 2016
En:Año: 2016
Críticas:[Rezension von: Framing archaeology in the Near East : the application of social theory to fieldwork] (2021) (Krieger, William Harvey, 1969 -)
Colección / Revista:New directions in anthropological archaeology
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Naher Osten / Arqueología
B Alter Orient / Arqueología / Antropología
Otras palabras clave:B Excavations (archaeology) (Middle East)
B Social Sciences Philosophy
B Anthropology Philosophy
B Archaeology Fieldwork (Middle East)
B Middle East Antiquities
B Colección de artículos
B Excavations (archaeology) Middle East
B Archaeology Philosophy
B Social archaeology (Middle East)
B Contribución 2012 (Warschau)
B Social archaeology Middle East
B Archaeology Fieldwork Middle East
Descripción
Sumario:"This volume presents a series of studies by scholars working in Middle Eastern archaeology who actively apply social theory to interpret their fieldwork. It aims to highlight the value of using social theory in the interpretation of field work in a region where, traditionally, such approaches have not played a major role. There are a number of factors that account for why social theory is often under-exploited by archaeologists in this part of the world. In many countries, where large numbers of the foreign archaeologists are involved, a division between those doing fieldwork and those undertaking archaeological interpretation can easily arise. Or, the lack of interest in social theory may stem from a legacy of positivism that overrides other approaches. There is also the fact that archaeology and anthropology often belong to separate academic departments and are considered two separate disciplines disconnected from each other. In some cases the centrality of historical paradigms has precluded the use of social theory. There are also divisions between universities and other research institutions, such as departments of antiquities, which is not conductive to interdisciplinary cooperation. This factor is especially debilitating in contexts of rapid destruction of sites and the exponential growth of salvage excavations and emergency surveys. The papers integrate a wide range of perspectives including 'New' or 'Processual' archaeology, Marxist, 'Post-Processual', evolutionist, cognitive, symbolic, and Cyber- archaeologies and touch on many topics including 3D representation, GIS, mapping and social theory, semiotics and linguistics, gender and bioarchaeology, social and technical identities, and modern historical modellingy and social practices"--Provided by publisher
Notas:Includes bibliographical references and index
Auch als Online-Ausgabe vorhanden
ISBN:178179247X