Islamist attitudes towards democracy: A review of the ideas of al-Ghazali, al-Turabi and 'Amara

In 1985 some political events took place indicating an increased interest in democracy in a number of Arab societies. The question of democracy has thus become relevant to the Islamists, who can be divided into three groups regarding their relationship to the concept of democracy: The first group re...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Solh, Raghid el- (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Εκτύπωση Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis 1993
Στο/Στη: British journal of Middle Eastern studies
Έτος: 1993, Τόμος: 20, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 57-63
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Φονταμενταλισμός <μοτίβο>
B Ισλάμ (μοτίβο)
B Islamische Staaten
B Εξισλαμισμός
B Δημοκρατία (μοτίβο)
B Politischer Islam
B Σύστημα εξουσίας
B Ιδεολογία
B Θρησκεία (μοτίβο)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:In 1985 some political events took place indicating an increased interest in democracy in a number of Arab societies. The question of democracy has thus become relevant to the Islamists, who can be divided into three groups regarding their relationship to the concept of democracy: The first group rejects democracy equating it with apostasy, the second group regards Islam as inherently democratic, thus not requiring experience from the non-Muslim world, the third group puts more emphasis on democracy in its representative forms than the former two groups and is less sceptical of borrowing experience from non-Muslim societies. Bearing this system of classification in mind, the author undertakes a closer examination of the positions of three prominent Islamist theorists: 1. al-Turabi (Sudan), who is regarded as a representative of the second group as he points out the superiority of al-shura in contrast of Western democracies; 2. 'Amara (Egypt) and 3. al-Ghazali (Egypt, Algeria), both of them are regarded as representatives of the third group, who differ from their Sudanese conterpart on a number of issues; the latter two prefer representative democracy, they both are open to learn from Western societies. (DÜI-Kli)
ISSN:1353-0194
Περιλαμβάνει:In: British journal of Middle Eastern studies