Islamist attitudes towards democracy: A review of the ideas of al-Ghazali, al-Turabi and 'Amara
In 1985 some political events took place indicating an increased interest in democracy in a number of Arab societies. The question of democracy has thus become relevant to the Islamists, who can be divided into three groups regarding their relationship to the concept of democracy: The first group re...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Print Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis
1993
|
| В: |
British journal of Middle Eastern studies
Год: 1993, Том: 20, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 57-63 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Фундаментализм (мотив)
B Islamische Staaten B Религия (мотив) B Политический ислам B Идеология B Ислам (мотив) B Демократия (мотив) B Исламизация B Режим |
| Итог: | In 1985 some political events took place indicating an increased interest in democracy in a number of Arab societies. The question of democracy has thus become relevant to the Islamists, who can be divided into three groups regarding their relationship to the concept of democracy: The first group rejects democracy equating it with apostasy, the second group regards Islam as inherently democratic, thus not requiring experience from the non-Muslim world, the third group puts more emphasis on democracy in its representative forms than the former two groups and is less sceptical of borrowing experience from non-Muslim societies. Bearing this system of classification in mind, the author undertakes a closer examination of the positions of three prominent Islamist theorists: 1. al-Turabi (Sudan), who is regarded as a representative of the second group as he points out the superiority of al-shura in contrast of Western democracies; 2. 'Amara (Egypt) and 3. al-Ghazali (Egypt, Algeria), both of them are regarded as representatives of the third group, who differ from their Sudanese conterpart on a number of issues; the latter two prefer representative democracy, they both are open to learn from Western societies. (DÜI-Kli) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1353-0194 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: British journal of Middle Eastern studies
|