Bones of contention: the decision to amputate in early modern Germany

The removal of a patient’s limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the “cold fire” (der kalte Brand) - a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering consequences for pati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hausse, Heidi (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Sixteenth Century Journal Publ. [2016]
En: The sixteenth century journal
Año: 2016, Volumen: 47, Número: 2, Páginas: 327-350
Clasificaciones IxTheo:CB Existencia cristiana
KAH Edad Moderna
KBB Región germanoparlante
Otras palabras clave:B Amputación History
B Early Modern History
B Social Exchange
B Holy Roman Empire History
B Medicine Germany History
Parallel Edition:Electrónico
Descripción
Sumario:The removal of a patient’s limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the “cold fire” (der kalte Brand) - a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering consequences for patients and their families. By drawing on surgical treatises, correspondences, field manuals, and examination books, this article uncovers a process of negotiation that took place during diagnosis and prognosis in cases of the cold fire. Medical reasoning entered a volatile social space in order to determine the best course of action. The opinions of medical colleagues, patients, family members, friends, and even pastors were crucial to the formation of a shared consensus necessary to undertake a procedure. Amputation was a collective endeavor guided as much by communal concerns as by medical ones.
ISSN:0361-0160
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: The sixteenth century journal