Location, location, location: effects of cross-religious primes on prosocial behavior

Priming with religious concepts is known to have a positive effect on prosocial behavior; however, the effects of religious primes associated with outgroups remain unknown. To explore this, we conducted a field experiment in a multicultural, multireligious setting (the island of Mauritius). Our desi...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Xygalatas, Dēmētrēs 1977- (Автор) ; Kundtová Klocová, Eva (Автор) ; Cigán, Jakub (Автор) ; Kundt, Radek 1981- (Автор) ; Maňo, Peter (Автор) ; Kotherová, Silvie (Автор) ; Mitkidis, Panagiotis (Автор) ; Wallot, Sebastian (Автор) ; Kanovský, Martin 1970- (Автор)
Формат: Electronic/Print Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group [2016]
В: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Год: 2016, Том: 26, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 304-319
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Религия (мотив) / Принцип / Просоциальное поведение / Межрелигиозность
Индексация IxTheo:AA Религиоведение
AD Социология религии
AE Психология религии
AX Межрелигиозные отношения
Online-ссылка: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:Электронный ресурс
Описание
Итог:Priming with religious concepts is known to have a positive effect on prosocial behavior; however, the effects of religious primes associated with outgroups remain unknown. To explore this, we conducted a field experiment in a multicultural, multireligious setting (the island of Mauritius). Our design used naturally occurring, ecologically relevant contextual primes pertinent to everyday religious and secular life while maintaining full experimental control. We found that both ingroup and outgroup religious contexts increased generosity as measured by a donation task. In accordance with previous research, we also found an interaction between individual religiosity and the efficacy of the religious primes. We discuss these findings and their interpretation, and we suggest potential avenues for further research.
Примечание:"Volume 26, Numbers 1-4 2016" sind in einem Heft erschienen
ISSN:1050-8619
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2015.1097287