Meeting the challenge: redefining Europe's classical model for state intervention in religious practices
This article challenges the affirmation that the State has an increasing obligation to interfere in religious practices in order to establish harmony between these practices and human rights. Using the phenomenon of religious divorce as a case, it is argued that State intervention is largely unneces...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Print Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage Publications Ltd
2006
|
| В: |
Netherlands quarterly of human rights
Год: 2006, Том: 24, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 33-59 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Интервенция (международное право)
B Инициатива B Концепция B Пример B Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte B Религия B Государство (мотив) B Предложение B Европа (мотив) B Соотношение (право) B Права человека (мотив) B Религиозная община |
| Итог: | This article challenges the affirmation that the State has an increasing obligation to interfere in religious practices in order to establish harmony between these practices and human rights. Using the phenomenon of religious divorce as a case, it is argued that State intervention is largely unnecessary, may well be fruitless and might even prove counter-productive. However, as it is not in society's interest to host huge discrepancies between human rights and religious practices, the article aims to find new ways for achieving greater harmony. We suggest a more complex version of the traditional European model for State intervention in religious affairs. In this model, the principle of legally limited State intervention blends with the State's primarily legal support of religious communities and individuals in their attempts to decrease discrepancies between human rights and religious practices. (Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0924-0519 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Netherlands quarterly of human rights
|