Pionierin der Religionspsychologie: Marianne Beth (1890-1984)

This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Belzen, J. A. van 1959- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electronic/Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Alemán
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Sage Publications Ltd. 2010
En: Archive for the psychology of religion
Año: 2010, Volumen: 32, Número: 2, Páginas: 125-145
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Beth, Marianne 1890-1984 / Religious psychology
Clasificaciones IxTheo:AE Psicología de la religión
KAJ Época contemporánea
Otras palabras clave:B psychology of religion Marianne Beth Karl Beth Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie unbelief Religious psychology Marianne Beth Karl Beth Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie Unbelief
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Descripción
Sumario:This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religion, and describes the tragic end the Nazi reign made to her development and career. Born as the daughter of a prominent Austrian Jewish lawyer living in Vienna, Marianne von Weisl received excellent intellectual training. Initially, her wish to become active in the same field as her father was frustrated by the injunction against women studying law. When this injunction was lifted, she went for a second doctorate in law, her first doctorate having been in the humanities. Marianne Beth became very active in public life (serving on the boards of many organizations, including international ones); she travelled and gave lectures and developed a large radius as a prolific author in newspapers and periodicals. Although clearly committed women’s rights, she did not belong to any feminist movement.
ISSN:0084-6724
Obras secundarias:In: Archive for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/157361210X500874