Pionierin der Religionspsychologie: Marianne Beth (1890-1984)

This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religi...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Belzen, J. A. van 1959- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Electronic/Print Artigo
Idioma:Alemão
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Sage Publications Ltd. 2010
Em: Archive for the psychology of religion
Ano: 2010, Volume: 32, Número: 2, Páginas: 125-145
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Beth, Marianne 1890-1984 / Psicologia da religião
Classificações IxTheo:AE Psicologia da religião
KAJ Época contemporânea
Outras palavras-chave:B psychology of religion Marianne Beth Karl Beth Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie unbelief Psicologia da religião Marianne Beth Karl Beth Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie Ateísmo
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Descrição
Resumo:This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religion, and describes the tragic end the Nazi reign made to her development and career. Born as the daughter of a prominent Austrian Jewish lawyer living in Vienna, Marianne von Weisl received excellent intellectual training. Initially, her wish to become active in the same field as her father was frustrated by the injunction against women studying law. When this injunction was lifted, she went for a second doctorate in law, her first doctorate having been in the humanities. Marianne Beth became very active in public life (serving on the boards of many organizations, including international ones); she travelled and gave lectures and developed a large radius as a prolific author in newspapers and periodicals. Although clearly committed women’s rights, she did not belong to any feminist movement.
ISSN:0084-6724
Obras secundárias:In: Archive for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/157361210X500874