Det oversete argument: C.S. Peirces "The neglected argument for the reality of God"

Resumé The article presents American semiotician Charles SandersPeirce’s 1908 essay “The Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”which has been viewed as notoriously difficult and obscure. The articleis primarily concerned with giving an account of the three stagesthat constitute Peirce’s argument...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ravn, Martin (Author)
Format: Print Review
Language:Danish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Anis 2012
In: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Year: 2012, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 203-221
Review of:Neglected argument for the reality of God / Charles S. Peirce (Ravn, Martin)
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Proof of God's existence
B Book review
B Concepts of God
B C.S. Peirce
B Pragmatism
B Naturalism
B Semiotics
B Logic
B Normativity

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1646969340
003 DE-627
005 20220616130111.0
007 tu
008 160405s2012 xx ||||| o 00| ||dan c
035 |a (DE-627)1646969340 
035 |a (DE-576)46763775X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ46763775X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a dan 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ravn, Martin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a Det oversete argument  |b C.S. Peirces "The neglected argument for the reality of God" 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Resumé The article presents American semiotician Charles SandersPeirce’s 1908 essay “The Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”which has been viewed as notoriously difficult and obscure. The articleis primarily concerned with giving an account of the three stagesthat constitute Peirce’s argument, as well as giving an interpretation oftheir interrelation (a much discussed problem in Peirce scholarship).Conclusively, the article reviews the relevance of the theological viewspresented in Peirce’s argument by sketching how Peirce’s idea of Goddraws the current discussion of the relationship between methodologicalnaturalism 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4021668-8  |0 (DE-627)10440972X  |0 (DE-576)208939288  |a Gottesbeweis  |2 gnd 
650 4 |a Normativity 
650 4 |a Pragmatism 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Logic 
650 4 |a C.S. Peirce 
650 4 |a Semiotics 
650 4 |a Concepts of God 
652 |a AB:NBC 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Dansk teologisk tidsskrift  |d Frederiksberg : Anis, 1938  |g 75(2012), 3, Seite 203-221  |w (DE-627)166747254  |w (DE-600)300166-0  |w (DE-576)015178161  |x 0105-3191  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2012  |g number:3  |g pages:203-221 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Neglected argument for the reality of God / Charles S. Peirce 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 75  |j 2012  |e 3  |h 203-221 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3321001535 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1646969340 
LOK |0 005 20160405162743 
LOK |0 008 160404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-03-05#3E73E3347B134D06E046C97BDB6A5C72F8FCDC2E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixmi  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Proof of God's existence,God,Existence of God,God's existence 
STB 0 0 |a Preuve de l’existence de Dieu 
STC 0 0 |a Prueba de la existencia de Dios 
STD 0 0 |a Prova dell'esistenza di Dio 
STE 0 0 |a 神存在的论证,上帝存在的论证 
STF 0 0 |a 神存在的論証,上帝存在的論証 
STG 0 0 |a Prova da existência de Deus 
STH 0 0 |a Доказательство существования Бога 
STI 0 0 |a Απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Gott