Det oversete argument: C.S. Peirces "The neglected argument for the reality of God"
Resumé The article presents American semiotician Charles SandersPeirce’s 1908 essay “The Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”which has been viewed as notoriously difficult and obscure. The articleis primarily concerned with giving an account of the three stagesthat constitute Peirce’s argument...
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | Print Review |
語言: | Danish |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Anis
2012
|
In: |
Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Year: 2012, 卷: 75, 發布: 3, Pages: 203-221 |
Review of: | Neglected argument for the reality of God / Charles S. Peirce (Ravn, Martin) |
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
書評
B Concepts of God B C.S. Peirce B Pragmatism B 神存在的論証 B Naturalism B Semiotics B Logic B Normativity |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1646969340 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220616130111.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160405s2012 xx ||||| o 00| ||dan c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1646969340 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)46763775X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ46763775X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a dan | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ravn, Martin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a Det oversete argument |b C.S. Peirces "The neglected argument for the reality of God" |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Resumé The article presents American semiotician Charles SandersPeirce’s 1908 essay “The Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”which has been viewed as notoriously difficult and obscure. The articleis primarily concerned with giving an account of the three stagesthat constitute Peirce’s argument, as well as giving an interpretation oftheir interrelation (a much discussed problem in Peirce scholarship).Conclusively, the article reviews the relevance of the theological viewspresented in Peirce’s argument by sketching how Peirce’s idea of Goddraws the current discussion of the relationship between methodologicalnaturalism | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4021668-8 |0 (DE-627)10440972X |0 (DE-576)208939288 |a Gottesbeweis |2 gnd |
650 | 4 | |a Normativity | |
650 | 4 | |a Pragmatism | |
650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
650 | 4 | |a C.S. Peirce | |
650 | 4 | |a Semiotics | |
650 | 4 | |a Concepts of God | |
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Dansk teologisk tidsskrift |d Frederiksberg : Anis, 1938 |g 75(2012), 3, Seite 203-221 |w (DE-627)166747254 |w (DE-600)300166-0 |w (DE-576)015178161 |x 0105-3191 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2012 |g number:3 |g pages:203-221 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezension von |a Neglected argument for the reality of God / Charles S. Peirce |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 75 |j 2012 |e 3 |h 203-221 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3321001535 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1646969340 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20160405162743 | ||
LOK | |0 008 160404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-03-05#3E73E3347B134D06E046C97BDB6A5C72F8FCDC2E | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixmi |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Proof of God's existence,God,Existence of God,God's existence |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Preuve de l’existence de Dieu |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Prueba de la existencia de Dios |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Prova dell'esistenza di Dio |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的论证,上帝存在的论证 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的論証,上帝存在的論証 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Prova da existência de Deus |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Доказательство существования Бога |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Gott |