An eighteenth-century manuscript: control of the scribal hand in "Clement's letter to Theodore"

This article discusses Morton Smith’s role as a self-professed manuscript hunter in uncovering the only known copy of Clement’s Letter to Theodore, and critically assesses the existing studies on its handwriting. We argue that Stephen C. Carlson’s analysis is flawed due to its dependence on distorte...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
Authors: Paananen, Timo S. (Author) ; Viklund, Roger 1957- (Author)
格式: Electronic/Print Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brepols [2015]
In: Apocrypha
Year: 2015, 卷: 26, Pages: 261-297
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Clemens, Alexandrinus ca. 150-215 / 书信 (文体) / 筆跡 / Smith, Morton 1915-1991 / 發現 / Echtheit
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
Further subjects:B Smith, Morton (1915-1991)
B Briefliteratur
B Clemens Alexandrinus
B 贋品
在線閱讀: Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:電子
實物特徵
總結:This article discusses Morton Smith’s role as a self-professed manuscript hunter in uncovering the only known copy of Clement’s Letter to Theodore, and critically assesses the existing studies on its handwriting. We argue that Stephen C. Carlson’s analysis is flawed due to its dependence on distorted images, that Agamemnon Tselikas’s study has a number of problems due to the unsuitability of applying standard palaeographic practices to a case of suspected deception, and that Venetia Anastasopoulou has made a sustainable case by arguing that Smith could not have imitated the difficult eighteenth-century script - a qualitative verdict strengthened by our quantitative study of the lack of signs of control. We conclude that the handwriting is indistinguishable from authentic eighteenth-century handwriting.
ISSN:1155-3316
Contains:Enthalten in: Apocrypha
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1484/J.APOCRA.5.109952