Nupcie facte sunt: Et transreformatorisk, kontekstualiserende studie af tre prædikener til anden søndag efter helligtrekonger

The article provides a comparative study of sermons on the wedding at Cana (Second Sunday after Epiphany) from three Danish sermon collections by Peter Madsen (d. c. 1486), Christiern Pedersen (d. 1554), and Hans Tausen (d. 1561). The study draws upon methodological developments within the field of...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kjøller-Rasmussen, Jonas (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Danois
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Anis [2018]
Dans: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Année: 2018, Volume: 81, Numéro: 2, Pages: 101-117
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Dänemark / Hochzeit zu Kana / Sermon / Contexte / Histoire 1450-1560
Classifications IxTheo:HC Nouveau Testament
KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance
KBE Scandinavie
KDB Église catholique romaine
KDD Église protestante
RE Homilétique
Sujets non-standardisés:B Christiern Pedersen
B postil
B trans-reformation
B Hans Tausen
B Preaching
B Sermon
B Peter Madsen
B Marriage
Description
Résumé:The article provides a comparative study of sermons on the wedding at Cana (Second Sunday after Epiphany) from three Danish sermon collections by Peter Madsen (d. c. 1486), Christiern Pedersen (d. 1554), and Hans Tausen (d. 1561). The study draws upon methodological developments within the field of sermon studies to show the importance of a contextualizing, trans-reformation perspective: contextualizing, by referring to the context of the sermon collection in the study of the singular sermon and taking into account its purpose and compilation; trans-reformation, by referring to a selection of material from before and after the reformation in order to better understand the reception of tradition through its rejection, adaptation, and continuation. On this basis, the article argues that before and after the reformation there was general agreement in the exegesis of the pericope, but great difference in how the text was used - a difference that may partly be explained by a contextualization of the sermon.
ISSN:0105-3191
Contient:Enthalten in: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift