Nupcie facte sunt: Et transreformatorisk, kontekstualiserende studie af tre prædikener til anden søndag efter helligtrekonger

The article provides a comparative study of sermons on the wedding at Cana (Second Sunday after Epiphany) from three Danish sermon collections by Peter Madsen (d. c. 1486), Christiern Pedersen (d. 1554), and Hans Tausen (d. 1561). The study draws upon methodological developments within the field of...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Kjøller-Rasmussen, Jonas (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Stampa Articolo
Lingua:Danese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Anis [2018]
In: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Anno: 2018, Volume: 81, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 101-117
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Dänemark / Hochzeit zu Kana / Omelia / Contesto / Storia 1450-1560
Notazioni IxTheo:HC Nuovo Testamento
KAG Riforma protestante
KBE Scandinavia
KDB Chiesa cattolica
KDD Chiesa evangelica
RE Omiletica
Altre parole chiave:B Christiern Pedersen
B postil
B trans-reformation
B Hans Tausen
B Preaching
B Sermon
B Peter Madsen
B Marriage
Descrizione
Riepilogo:The article provides a comparative study of sermons on the wedding at Cana (Second Sunday after Epiphany) from three Danish sermon collections by Peter Madsen (d. c. 1486), Christiern Pedersen (d. 1554), and Hans Tausen (d. 1561). The study draws upon methodological developments within the field of sermon studies to show the importance of a contextualizing, trans-reformation perspective: contextualizing, by referring to the context of the sermon collection in the study of the singular sermon and taking into account its purpose and compilation; trans-reformation, by referring to a selection of material from before and after the reformation in order to better understand the reception of tradition through its rejection, adaptation, and continuation. On this basis, the article argues that before and after the reformation there was general agreement in the exegesis of the pericope, but great difference in how the text was used - a difference that may partly be explained by a contextualization of the sermon.
ISSN:0105-3191
Comprende:Enthalten in: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift