Josephus' portrait of Solomon

In Josephus' rewriting of the biblical account of Solomon, Josephus draws upon Homer, Hesiod, Sophocles, and Thucydides, among others. His portrayal of Solomon plays a key role in his attempt to answer the charge that the Jews had failed to produce great men. In particular, Josephus stresses So...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Auteur principal: Feldman, Louis H. 1926- (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: College 1995
Dans: Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Année: 1995, Volume: 66, Pages: 103-167
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Josephus, Flavius 37-100 / Bibel. Altes Testament
Classifications IxTheo:HB Ancien Testament
HD Judaïsme ancien
Sujets non-standardisés:B Salomo Israel, König
B Josephus, Flavius (37-100)
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:In Josephus' rewriting of the biblical account of Solomon, Josephus draws upon Homer, Hesiod, Sophocles, and Thucydides, among others. His portrayal of Solomon plays a key role in his attempt to answer the charge that the Jews had failed to produce great men. In particular, Josephus stresses Solomon's precociousness, wealth, courage, temperance, justice, magnanimity, gratefulness, generosity, and piety. Above all, in striking additions, Josephus' Solomon displays wisdom reminiscent of Oedipus, in the cleverness and speed with which he resolves the case of the two mothers. This wisdom is that of a rational and philosophical king and judge. Nevertheless, Solomon is portrayed as so modest that, despite his extraordinary wisdom, he admits that he has been outwitted by a young Tyrian lad, Abdemon. Josephus also portrays Solomon as skilled in exorcising demons. Josephus emphasizes Solomon's political and economic achievements in administering his state. There are contemporary implications in Josephus' stress on Solomon's avoidance of civil dissension, an evil that Josephus decried so vehemently in his Jewish War. By adding greatly to the description of the beauty of the Temple which Solomon built, he magnifies Solomon's wealth and piety. In criticizing Solomon's intermarriages, Josephus is careful to base his opposition not on the ground of his aversion to intermarriage as such but rather on his objection to Solomon's yielding to passion, a point which Stoics in his audience would have appreciated. To refute the charge that Jews hate non-Jews Josephus dwells on the warm friendship of Solomon with Hiram, the king of Tyre. To corroborate the biblical account he cites evidence from the Phoenician archives and from the works of non-Jewish writers, Dios and Menander of Ephesus. Finally, Josephus has sought to improve upon the biblical text by avoiding difficulties and implausibilities and by increasing suspense and dramatic and romantic interest.
ISSN:0360-9049
Contient:In: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion