Semantics and the semantics of brʼ: a rejoinder to the arguments advanced by B. Becking and M. Korpel
Becking and Korpel argued that ברא should be construed as “to construct.” Van Wolde and Rezetko respond to their arguments with a critical review of earlier biblical studies, reflections on biblical and extra-biblical semantics including studies of verbs expressing “separation-events,” etymological...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
The National Library of Canada
2011
|
| Στο/Στη: |
The journal of Hebrew scriptures
Έτος: 2011, Τόμος: 11, Σελίδες: 2-39 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΗΒ Παλαιά Διαθήκη |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Σύνοψη: | Becking and Korpel argued that ברא should be construed as “to construct.” Van Wolde and Rezetko respond to their arguments with a critical review of earlier biblical studies, reflections on biblical and extra-biblical semantics including studies of verbs expressing “separation-events,” etymological studies including evidence from Samaritan texts, and a more complete analysis of various Biblical Hebrew verbs and proper names. These studies lead to the conclusion that Van Wolde's proposal that ברא should be construed as “to spatially separate” remains a viable explanation for the semantics of this verb. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1203-1542 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: The journal of Hebrew scriptures
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5508/jhs.2011.v11.a9 |