Semantics and the semantics of brʼ: a rejoinder to the arguments advanced by B. Becking and M. Korpel
Becking and Korpel argued that ברא should be construed as “to construct.” Van Wolde and Rezetko respond to their arguments with a critical review of earlier biblical studies, reflections on biblical and extra-biblical semantics including studies of verbs expressing “separation-events,” etymological...
| Autores principales: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
The National Library of Canada
2011
|
| En: |
The journal of Hebrew scriptures
Año: 2011, Volumen: 11, Páginas: 2-39 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | HB Antiguo Testamento |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | Becking and Korpel argued that ברא should be construed as “to construct.” Van Wolde and Rezetko respond to their arguments with a critical review of earlier biblical studies, reflections on biblical and extra-biblical semantics including studies of verbs expressing “separation-events,” etymological studies including evidence from Samaritan texts, and a more complete analysis of various Biblical Hebrew verbs and proper names. These studies lead to the conclusion that Van Wolde's proposal that ברא should be construed as “to spatially separate” remains a viable explanation for the semantics of this verb. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1203-1542 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: The journal of Hebrew scriptures
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5508/jhs.2011.v11.a9 |