Misogyny revisited: the Eve traditions in Avot de Rabbi Natan, versions A and B

This interdisciplinary study of gender in Avot de Rabbi Natan, using a theoretical frame from cultural anthropology, is an enterprise of feminist historiography. Focusing on ARNB's singular formulation of aggadic accounts of Eve's sin, it proposes a possible historical trajectory of Jewish...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Другие заглавия:Research Article
Главный автор: Polzer, Natalie C. 1957- (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: University of Pennsylvania Press [2012]
В: AJS review
Год: 2012, Том: 36, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 207-255
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Женоненавистничество / Babylonischer Talmud. Kleine Traktate. Avot de-Rabbi Nathan / Eva, Библейский персонаж (мотив) / Иудаизм (мотив) / Традиция
Индексация IxTheo:BH Иудаизм
Другие ключевые слова:B Women
B Traditions
B Men
B Redaction
B Misogyny
B Sin
B Jewish rituals
Online-ссылка: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:This interdisciplinary study of gender in Avot de Rabbi Natan, using a theoretical frame from cultural anthropology, is an enterprise of feminist historiography. Focusing on ARNB's singular formulation of aggadic accounts of Eve's sin, it proposes a possible historical trajectory of Jewish women's experience and how that experience was perceived, manipulated and/or negotiated by the Jewish men who were the formulators and transmitters of rabbinic tradition. Generally speaking, traditions about women and gender in ARN demonstrate a stance on the natural, religious and social subordination of women to men, which I will designate “patriarchal stewardship.” Yet the Eve traditions, especially those in ARNB, go beyond articulating this androcentric stance on gender differentiation and social hierarchy; they negotiate a cognitive, religious problem: why do women, and women alone, suffer and die in the process of biological reproduction if “be fruitful and multiply” is a divine imperative in Genesis 1:28?
ISSN:1475-4541
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0364009412000177