The Danielic discourse on empire in Second Temple literature

"In The Danielic Discourse on Empire in Second Temple Literature, Alexandria Frisch asks: how did Jews in the Second Temple period understand the phenomenon of foreign empire? In answering this question, a remarkable trend reveals itself--the book of Daniel, which situates its narrative in an i...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Frisch, Alexandria (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс
Язык:Английский
Слжба доставки Subito: Заказать сейчас.
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Leiden Boston Brill 2016
В: Journal for the study of Judaism (176)
Год: 2016
Обзоры:[Rezension von: Frisch, Alexandria, The Danielic discourse on empire in Second Temple literature] (2018) (Newsom, Carol Ann, 1950 -)
The Danielic Discourse on Empire inSecond Temple Literature (2018) (Rösel, Martin, 1961 -)
Серии журналов/журналы:Journal for the study of Judaism Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism 176
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Bibel. Daniel / Имперализм (мотив) / Царство Божие
Другие ключевые слова:B Bible. Daniel Criticism, interpretation, etc
B Bible
B Академические публикации
B Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc
B Criticism, interpretation, etc
Online-ссылка: Volltext (DOI)
Volltext (Verlag)
Описание
Итог:"In The Danielic Discourse on Empire in Second Temple Literature, Alexandria Frisch asks: how did Jews in the Second Temple period understand the phenomenon of foreign empire? In answering this question, a remarkable trend reveals itself--the book of Daniel, which situates its narrative in an imperial context and apocalyptically envisions empires, was overwhelmingly used by Jewish writers when they wanted to say something about empires. This study examines Daniel, as well as antecedents to and interpretations of Daniel, in order to identify the diachronic changes in perceptions of empire during this period. Oftentimes, this Danielic discourse directly reacted to imperial ideologies, either copying, subverting, or adapting those ideologies. Throughout this study, postcolonial criticism, therefore, provides a hermeneutical lens through which to ask a second question: in an imperial context, is the Jewish conception of empire actually Jewish?"--
Примечание:Description based upon print version of record$lvolume 176
ISBN:9004331298
Доступ:Available to subscribing member institutions only
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/9789004331310