Panentheism and its neighbors

In this paper I suggest that we should identify panentheism on a scale, with deism at one extreme and pantheism at the other. The surprising outcome of the analysis is that many of the things which in the philosophical and theological debate are simply taken for granted as distinguishing panentheism...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Stenmark, Mikael 1962- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, 卷: 85, 發布: 1, Pages: 23-41
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 萬有在神論 / 自然神論 / 泛神論
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Pantheism
B Process Theism
B Panentheism
B Classical Theism
B Deism
在線閱讀: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
實物特徵
總結:In this paper I suggest that we should identify panentheism on a scale, with deism at one extreme and pantheism at the other. The surprising outcome of the analysis is that many of the things which in the philosophical and theological debate are simply taken for granted as distinguishing panentheism from traditional theism (and vice versa) turn out to be possible extension claims rather than core doctrines of these different conceptions of God. Nevertheless, I maintain that it remains possible to draw a line between them. It is also emphasized that the greatest challenge many panentheists face is to give a convincing argument why we should think that God's power can never be coercive, but must always be persuasive. The good news is that there is nothing in panentheism that requires that we must accept this particular doctrine.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-018-9687-9