Re-evaluating the hiddenness argument from above

J. L. Schellenberg's hiddenness argument for atheism (2015) assumes that God's perpetual openness to a relationship with any finite person is consistent with their perpetual flourishing. However, I argue that if Aquinas-Stump's account of the nature of love is true, then any finite pe...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Vandergriff, Kevin (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, 卷: 85, 发布: 2, Pages: 193-211
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 隐藏的上帝 / / / 无神论
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Nonresistant Nonbelief
B Atheism
B Love
B Motivational externalism
B Hiddenness
B Aquinas-Stump
B Schellenberg
在线阅读: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
实物特征
总结:J. L. Schellenberg's hiddenness argument for atheism (2015) assumes that God's perpetual openness to a relationship with any finite person is consistent with their perpetual flourishing. However, I argue that if Aquinas-Stump's account of the nature of love is true, then any finite person flourishes the most only if they attain the greatest degree of union among God and all relevant parties. Moreover, if Humean externalism is true, then any finite person might not have their greatest attainable degree of union among God and all relevant parties, as soon as possible, unless God sacrifices some time in the union-not the whole union-with them. Accordingly, God's perpetual openness might not be consistent with the future flourishing of any finite person-from which it follows that a crucial assumption of the hiddenness argument might not be true.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-018-9676-z