Engaging with Buddhism
In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Altri autori: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Review |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Anno: 2018, Volume: 57, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 547-558 |
| Recensione di: | Engaging Buddhism (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2015) (Avramides, Anita)
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | BL Buddhismo NBE Antropologia VA Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
The Self
B Persons B Peter Strawson B Pudgalavādins B Recensione B Karma |
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Riepilogo: | In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda ("Personalists"). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Riferimento: | Kritik in "Engaging Engagements with Engaging Buddhism (2018)"
|
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0681-6 |