Engaging with Buddhism
In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Review |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| Em: |
Sophia
Ano: 2018, Volume: 57, Número: 4, Páginas: 547-558 |
| Resenha de: | Engaging Buddhism (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2015) (Avramides, Anita)
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | BL Budismo NBE Antropologia VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
The Self
B Persons B Peter Strawson B Pudgalavādins B Karma B Resenha |
| Acesso em linha: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Resumo: | In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda ("Personalists"). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Engaging Engagements with Engaging Buddhism (2018)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0681-6 |