Engaging with Buddhism
In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 其他作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Review |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2018, 卷: 57, 發布: 4, Pages: 547-558 |
| Review of: | Engaging Buddhism (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2015) (Avramides, Anita)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BL Buddhism NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
書評
B The Self B Persons B Peter Strawson B 業 B Pudgalavādins |
| 在線閱讀: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| 總結: | In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda ("Personalists"). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Engaging Engagements with Engaging Buddhism (2018)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0681-6 |