Godmanhood vs Mangodhood: An Eastern Orthodox Response to Transhumanism

This article distances the classic Patristic teaching of Eastern Orthodoxy on theosis from the pseudo-religious ideology of transhumanism. By appealing to the Silver Age of Russian theologians a century ago, today's transhumanist vision is dubbed Mangodhood, an idolatrous construction of a tech...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Gallaher, Brandon 1972- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage [2019]
Dans: Studies in Christian ethics
Année: 2019, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 200-215
Classifications IxTheo:KDF Église orthodoxe
NBE Anthropologie
NBK Sotériologie
NCJ Science et éthique
Sujets non-standardisés:B Homo Deus
B Deification
B Transhumanism
B Godmanhood
B Theosis
B Mangodhood
B Satan
B Orthodoxy
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:This article distances the classic Patristic teaching of Eastern Orthodoxy on theosis from the pseudo-religious ideology of transhumanism. By appealing to the Silver Age of Russian theologians a century ago, today's transhumanist vision is dubbed Mangodhood, an idolatrous construction of a technological Tower of Babel. In contrast, the classical Orthodox teaching of deification or theosis relies on the spiritual grace of the true God, rendering the true goal of religion to be Godmanhood.
ISSN:0953-9468
Contient:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946819827136