Implicit Beliefs, Explicit Practices? How International Human Rights Law Manages Religion
In this article, I discuss how international human rights law (IHRL) interacts with the notions of "implicit" and "lived" religion. More specifically, I examine the capability of Article 9 on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the European Convention on Human Righ...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Equinox
[2019]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Implicit religion
Έτος: 2018, Τόμος: 21, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 285-300 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Lived Religion
B Human Rights B European Court of Human Rights B Religious Freedom B Implicit Religion |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | In this article, I discuss how international human rights law (IHRL) interacts with the notions of "implicit" and "lived" religion. More specifically, I examine the capability of Article 9 on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to provide protection for rights claims that derive from "implicit" and "lived" forms of religion. I develop this argument in three steps: First, I provide a working definition of "implicit" and "lived" religion. Second, I assess the provisions on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the ECHR, asking what kinds of "religion" are most likely to gain protections under this instrument. Third, I review some recent cases to come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which monitors the ECHR, gauging which forms of religion have been recognized by the court. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-1697 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Implicit religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/imre.37955 |