Concept History and Religious Discourse
Since the second half of the twentieth century, the history of concepts (Begriffsgeschichte) has made important contributions to the study of political and social thought, as well as to cultural history more generally. Reinhart Koselleck has argued that, during the eighteenth century, basic concept...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
| В: |
Journal of religious and theological information
Год: 2017, Том: 16, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 87-97 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | CG Христианство и политика CH Христианство и общество KAA История церкви KAH Новое время |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Concepts
B Reinhart Koselleck B conceptual history B Religious Discourse |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Итог: | Since the second half of the twentieth century, the history of concepts (Begriffsgeschichte) has made important contributions to the study of political and social thought, as well as to cultural history more generally. Reinhart Koselleck has argued that, during the eighteenth century, basic concept use in Europe experienced widespread trends of (1) democratization, (2) temporalization, (3) ideologization, and (4) politicization. This article will consider the possibility of a conceptual history of religious discourse. While conceptual history has thus far focused primarily on political and social concepts, some research has more recently turned to religious concepts. This work should be expanded and can be improved by the insight of theologians and ethicists who often have a better understanding of religious concept use than conceptual historians whose main focus is political thought. I will summarize how concept history could be applied to religious concepts, how theologians might make a contribution to the theory behind Koselleck's understanding of modern concept use, and offer a critique of a recent methodological introduction to religious concept history. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1528-6924 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious and theological information
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/10477845.2017.1328184 |