Religion and United States Physicians' Opinions and Self-Predicted Practices Concerning Artificial Nutrition and Hydration

This study surveyed 1,156 practicing US physicians to examine the relationship between physicians' religious characteristics and their approaches to artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH). Forty percent of physicians believed that unless a patient is imminently dying, the patient should alway...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Wolenberg, Kelly M. (Συγγραφέας) ; Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1950- (Συγγραφέας) ; Curlin, Farr A. (Συγγραφέας) ; Yoon, John D. (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Springer Science + Business Media B. V. [2013]
Στο/Στη: Journal of religion and health
Έτος: 2013, Τόμος: 52, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 1051-1065
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B end of life
B Ethics
B artificial nutrition and hydration
B Tube feeding
B Θρησκεία (μοτίβο)
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:This study surveyed 1,156 practicing US physicians to examine the relationship between physicians' religious characteristics and their approaches to artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH). Forty percent of physicians believed that unless a patient is imminently dying, the patient should always receive nutrition and fluids; 75 % believed that it is ethically permissible for doctors to withdraw ANH. The least religious physicians were less likely to oppose withholding or withdrawing ANH. Compared to non-evangelical Protestant physicians, Jews and Muslims were significantly more likely to oppose withholding ANH, and Muslims were significantly more likely to oppose withdrawing ANH.
ISSN:1573-6571
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10943-013-9740-z