The Sacrifice of Knowledge: Vain Debates in the Social Scientific Study of Religion
Since its inception, the social scientific study of religion has been a battleground for scholars advocating for the advantages of one sort of methodology over against the other. I argue that these debates have more to do with the personalities of the researchers rather than any kind of justifiable...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[2013]
|
En: |
Journal of religion and health
Año: 2013, Volumen: 52, Número: 1, Páginas: 66-73 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Methodology
B Academy B Symptoms |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Sumario: | Since its inception, the social scientific study of religion has been a battleground for scholars advocating for the advantages of one sort of methodology over against the other. I argue that these debates have more to do with the personalities of the researchers rather than any kind of justifiable proof that one method is better than another. I argue that the process by which scholars quarrel over methods is a sign of stagnation or regression in the academy; I draw broad implications for the health of the discipline of religious studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10943-010-9427-7 |