The First Church of Christ, Pragmatist: Christian Science and Responsible Optimism
A common criticism of Christian Science is that it is neither Christian nor scientific. American psychologist and philosopher William James would not, I believe, share this view, even though he does make critical comments about Christian Science's orginator and her dogmatic followers. Following...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[2012]
|
| In: |
Journal of religion and health
Jahr: 2012, Band: 51, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1397-1405 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Christian Science
B Pragmatism B William James |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | A common criticism of Christian Science is that it is neither Christian nor scientific. American psychologist and philosopher William James would not, I believe, share this view, even though he does make critical comments about Christian Science's orginator and her dogmatic followers. Following a suggestion of James, I distinguish two types of critical inquiry into Christian Scienceoutsider criticism and insider criticismand show that the latter yields the better results. A pragmatic version of Christian Science can be offered that is distinct both from the myopic critics who malign it and from the dogmatic followers who recklessly adhere to it. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9508-2 |