The First Church of Christ, Pragmatist: Christian Science and Responsible Optimism
A common criticism of Christian Science is that it is neither Christian nor scientific. American psychologist and philosopher William James would not, I believe, share this view, even though he does make critical comments about Christian Science's orginator and her dogmatic followers. Following...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[2012]
|
| Em: |
Journal of religion and health
Ano: 2012, Volume: 51, Número: 4, Páginas: 1397-1405 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Christian Science
B Pragmatism B William James |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Resumo: | A common criticism of Christian Science is that it is neither Christian nor scientific. American psychologist and philosopher William James would not, I believe, share this view, even though he does make critical comments about Christian Science's orginator and her dogmatic followers. Following a suggestion of James, I distinguish two types of critical inquiry into Christian Scienceoutsider criticism and insider criticismand show that the latter yields the better results. A pragmatic version of Christian Science can be offered that is distinct both from the myopic critics who malign it and from the dogmatic followers who recklessly adhere to it. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9508-2 |