Lame Science? Blind Religion?
In Consecrating Science, Lisa Sideris argues that an anthropocentric and science-based cosmology encourages human arrogance and diminishes a sense of wonder in human experience immersed in the natural world, as found in diverse cultural and religious traditions. I agree with her that science elevate...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Другие авторы: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Review |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
[2019]
|
В: |
Zygon
Год: 2019, Том: 54, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 351-353 |
Рецензировано: | Consecrating science (Oakland, California : University of California Press, 2017) (Rolston, Holmes)
|
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Сциентизм
/ Критика религии
|
Другие ключевые слова: | B
cosmogenesis
B wonderland Earth B Рецензия B Lisa Sideris B Wonder |
Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | In Consecrating Science, Lisa Sideris argues that an anthropocentric and science-based cosmology encourages human arrogance and diminishes a sense of wonder in human experience immersed in the natural world, as found in diverse cultural and religious traditions. I agree with her that science elevated to a commanding worldview, scientism, is a common and contemporary mistake, to be deplored, a lame science. But I further argue that science has introduced us to the marvels of deep nature and vastly increased our human appreciation of nature as a wonderland at levels great and small. Sideris is right to fear consecrating science. She-and the humanists, sages, and saviors-need also to fear blindness to what science has to teach us about cosmogenesis and wonderland Earth. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Wonder Sustained (2019)"
|
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12508 |