Orientalism in the European Court of Human Rights

AbstractThis article provides an anti-Orientalist critique of jurisprudence within the European Court of Human Rights. Discussion is located in the context of the longstanding debate over what it is to be "European" and an awareness of how these wider discourses shape rights adjudication a...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Skeet, Charlotte Helen (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Brill, Nijhoff 2019
В: Religion and human rights
Год: 2019, Том: 14, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 31-63
Индексация IxTheo:AA Религиоведение
AB Философия религии
KBA Западная Европа
XA Право
Другие ключевые слова:B feminist legal theory
B postcolonial legal theory
B European Court of Human Rights
B Orientalism
B Gender
B Intersectionality
B right to freedom of religion or belief
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1671243595
003 DE-627
005 20200825164557.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190813s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1671243595 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1671243595 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Skeet, Charlotte Helen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Orientalism in the European Court of Human Rights  |c Charlotte Helen Skeet 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a AbstractThis article provides an anti-Orientalist critique of jurisprudence within the European Court of Human Rights. Discussion is located in the context of the longstanding debate over what it is to be "European" and an awareness of how these wider discourses shape rights adjudication at national and intra-national levels in Europe. Argument draws on literature from post-colonial theorists, cultural studies, and feminist legal theory which identify and discuss "Orientalist" discourses to analyse the production of legal knowledge and jurisprudence from the European Court of Human Rights. The article argues that Orientalist discourses affect the ways that the Court constructs and positions both the claimant and the respondent state in human rights claims. These constructions influence cases involving Muslim claimants and have a particularly negative impact on the outcome of claims by visibly-Muslim women. The final part of the article suggests ways that these negative discourses and constructions can be countered. 
650 4 |a European Court of Human Rights 
650 4 |a Orientalism 
650 4 |a feminist legal theory 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a Intersectionality 
650 4 |a postcolonial legal theory 
650 4 |a right to freedom of religion or belief 
652 |a AA:AB:KBA:XA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion and human rights  |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006  |g 14(2019), 1, Seite 31-63  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)518818446  |w (DE-600)2254876-2  |w (DE-576)321221702  |x 1871-0328  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g pages:31-63 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-13021145  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2019  |e 1  |h 31-63 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3564047875 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1671243595 
LOK |0 005 20200825164557 
LOK |0 008 191212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044691  |a KBA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053798  |a XA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042966  |a AA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REF |a Religionstheorie 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Soziales Geschlecht,Geschlecht,Geschlecht