Hate Speech and Self-Restraint

In this article, my aim is to consider under what circumstances, and for what reasons, individuals may freely choose not to speak hatefully about others. Even if not threatened with legal sanction, why might they decide not to say something which they think they have good reason to say? My suggestio...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Thompson, Simon (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
Dans: Ethical theory and moral practice
Année: 2019, Volume: 22, Numéro: 3, Pages: 657-671
Classifications IxTheo:NCB Éthique individuelle
VA Philosophie
ZD Psychologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ethics
B Morality
B Pro tanto reasons
B Self-censorship
B Civility
B Hatred
B Self-restraint
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:In this article, my aim is to consider under what circumstances, and for what reasons, individuals may freely choose not to speak hatefully about others. Even if not threatened with legal sanction, why might they decide not to say something which they think they have good reason to say? My suggestion will be that there are various pro tanto reasons for individuals to restrain themselves from saying what they wanted to say. To be specific, I shall argue that such reasons fall into three analytically distinct categories, which I shall describe as normative codes of civility, ethics and morality. Thus each of these codes may provide different sorts of reasons for not engaging in hate speech. My hope is that the results of this investigation may usefully inform a strategy which aims to combat such speech without resource to the law.
ISSN:1572-8447
Contient:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-019-10004-y