Response: How Do We Know What We Know About the Amish and Other Minorities?

The appraisal by Cory Anderson, Joseph Donnermeyer, Jeffrey Longhofer, and Steven Reschly (hereafter, appraisers) highlights a methodological divide that is important to the study of the Amish and other ethnic or religious minorities. In my reply, I discuss how my work is rooted in a cultural analyt...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kraybill, Donald B. 1945- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
Dans: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 58, Numéro: 3, Pages: 743-752
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Amish / Recherche
Classifications IxTheo:AD Sociologie des religions
KBQ Amérique du Nord
KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ethnic minorities
B Epistemology
B Amish
B Religious Minorities
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The appraisal by Cory Anderson, Joseph Donnermeyer, Jeffrey Longhofer, and Steven Reschly (hereafter, appraisers) highlights a methodological divide that is important to the study of the Amish and other ethnic or religious minorities. In my reply, I discuss how my work is rooted in a cultural analytic paradigm that differs from the appraisers' methodological orientation. My reply includes a deconstruction of the appraisal and a discussion of its "shortcomings." I conclude by showing how the discourse surrounding this appraisal raises important epistemological questions of how we understand human societies.
ISSN:1468-5906
Référence:Kritik von "A Critical Appraisal of Amish Studies' De Facto Paradigm, "Negotiating with Modernity" (2019)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12619