The date of building 338 at Megiddo: a rejoinder

Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Usishḳin, Daṿid 1935- (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Soc. 2017
In: Israel exploration journal
Year: 2017, Volume: 67, Issue: 1, Pages: 50-60
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Megiddo / Palestine / Archaeology / Pre- and early history / Israel
IxTheo Classification:BC Ancient Orient; religion
HH Archaeology
Description
Summary:Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating to Stratum VA–IVB, on the basis of all available data.
ISSN:0021-2059
Contains:Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal